Senate Blue ribbon and labor committees hearing

Senate Blue ribbon and labor committees hearing, a set on Flickr.

Senate Blue ribbon and labor committees hearing

ICMC-AWG Meets in Manila

by Fr. Edwin D. Corros, CS
CBCP-ECMI
Manila, June 23, 2013

                 The Episcopal Commission for the Pastoral Care of Migrants and Itinerant People (ECMI) of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) hosted the third meeting of the Asian Working Group (AWG) of the International Catholic Migration Commission (ICMC). Philippines’ Vice President Jejomar Binay and the administrator of Overseas Workers Welfare Administration, Dr. Carmelita Dimzon were invited as resource speakers.  The meeting was held in Manila Manor Hotel in Malate, Manila last June 21 to 22. It was attended by a dozen officials from the Catholic Church of ten Asian countries. Both the high ranking government officials  spoke lengthily of the Philippine government’s commitment in protecting the numerous Filipino migrants scattered in at least 200 countries around the world.

                The Vice President instead of just giving his solidarity message  extended his stay and dialogue with the participants on what both the government and the church could do together to assist in the protection of migrant Filipinos working in various countries.

                Responding to the presentation shared by VP Binay, many AWG members expressed gratitude for his sharing. They are also impressed on how much the Philippine government had shown concern for their own people. Fr. John Ty of Vietnam expressed his gratitude on behalf of the Vietnamese church and former refugees who once sought refuge in the shores of the Philippines.   He highlighted the warmest hospitality  the Filipino people had shown to the Vietnamese refugees and told the vice president that it was only in the refugee camps in the Philippines where the Vietnamese did not experience any abuse while they await for their  transfer to other countries like United States, Canada, New Zealand and Australia.

the ratification of the UN convention on the protection of the rights of the migrants and their families in their respective countries as this will help provide better protection to the OFWs working in their countries.

                 Outside the topic that she was tasked to deliver, Dr. Dimzon likewise addressed the AWG members over her deep concern of the many Catholics who had left the Church and had moved to join other religious sects when they go abroad.  Being Catholic herself and a product of the University of Santo Tomas, it pained her to observe this reality in her many trips overseas. She had asked the church officials what they could do to stop this reality. Responding to her concern, Bishop Cantillas had acknowledged the same reality existing in the country and the need to address the challenge of evangelization needed in the whole Church. Bishop Cantillas thanked Admin. Dimzon for her generous time and for the very valuable input she shared with the AWG members.

                The members of the AWG were likewise benefitted by the sharing of the speaker from a non-government organization,       the Development Action Women Network (DAWN), a migrant NGO   headed by Ms. Carmelita Nuqui. She shared the stories of the Filipino women migrants who used to work in Japan as entertainers. Ms. Nuqui specifically shared her experience working with them and the programs and services her organization provides. With her presentation, the understanding of the concept of families of migrants  made the discussion even more fruitful. They were furthermore animated by the continuous discussion mostly of common knowledge to the participants as they were the same issues already  discussed and reflected in the past.

     Just as Mr. Johan Ketelers, the ICMC secretary general had earlier acknowledge in his opening  remarks the various yet similar realities confronting the migrants and their families in Asia demand even more an urgent response. The report presented however by the representative from Cambodia painted a very striking unusual reality.  He shared that due to the very strong indoctrination created by the communist regime to its people, the traditional concept of a family has practically been erased from the minds of the people. The church being a minority has to work tremendously even on this respect. The Jesuit priest, Fr. Totet Banaynal was just grateful to the AWG for having been invited to join this meeting as he has just learned so many things about the many complex issues linked to migration. The Church in Cambodia according to him has just started to organize herself and there are no records yet to share. He has however assured everyone that he will share all that he has learned from this meeting with his bishop.  

            As the AWG members continued to share their reflection on how the Church’s ministry to migrants and their families will become an Asian platform, Fr. Peter O’Neill of Taiwan likewise expressed his observation that as individual bishops’ conference, they are mostly working quite effectively in their respective country even collaborating closely with various government agencies and offices but as a region there’s still a lot to do. It was from this point that a long discussion on the identity and the purpose of the AWG was debated on and discussed clarifying its relationship with the Office for Human Development (OHD) of the Federation of the Asian Bishops’ Conference (FABC). The presence of the secretary general of the FABC, Archbishop Charles Bo of Myanmar who made it in the second day of the meeting was providential in the discussion.

                     ICMC being based in Geneva, Switzerland desires and supports what the leaders of the Asian Church wishes to attain for the migrants characterized by common issues but of different characteristics. Asia hosts the greatest number of migrants in the world. Mr. Johan Ketelers came to Manila to help facilitate the meeting of twelve delegates from Cambodia, India, Korea, Myanmar, the Philippines, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam.  In their two days gathering, they were joined by several representatives from non-government organizations and government agencies in the Philippines working closely with migrants and their families to help them discern in their own establishment as AWG.

      Actively working in every local church where they belong, it was observed that all the participants tried to gather their acts together to show what the churches in Asia had done and trying to do for the migrants in the region.

   Being a small group working separately in their own country, the AWG traced its humble beginning five years ago where the group had proposed that the Asian church must learn to work closely together and collaborate as well with government. The platform that everyone had so desired is now clearly a work in progress according to Bp. Cantillas.

      From its conceptualization in Thailand five years ago, the AWG had held its second meeting in Taiwan two years ago exactly to follow up the desire for an Asian platform.  It was in Taiwan meeting that the AWG had decided to focus their reflection on the issues of families of migrants in this Manila meeting. The members of the AWG had tried to identify common denominators of migrants’ experiences in their countries while continued to hope that someday, the problem of poverty will stop labour migration.

Photos for the 2nd Quarter Newsletter of 2013

Consultations held on LOIPR

by Elena Lopez, CMA

As a state party to the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, the Philippines is obligated to submit regular reports to the UN Committee on Migrant Workers (CMW), a body of independent experts who monitor the implementation of the convention. In April 2012, the Philippines received a List of Issues Prior to Reporting (LOIPR) issued by the CMW. The Philippine government’s next state party report will reply to the issues raised in the LOIPR.

In preparation for this report, Center for Migrant Advocacy (CMA) and the Commission on Human Rights (CHR) requested inputs and insights from NGOs in regards to the state’s progression and improvements, in reference to the LOIPR. These inputs and insights will be used to generate a report to be presented as the state party’s alternative periodic report. So far, two consultations have been hosted to allow NGOs to voice their thoughts: the Manila-Luzon consultation on June 11th and the Davao-Mindanao consultation on June 28th.

These consultations are essential for providing a venue for NGOs and CSOs to share their knowledge and concerns regarding the implementation of the convention. Since the Philippines’ last state party report was in 2008, it is important to determine what changes have occurred since the CMW last offered its concerns, suggestions, and recommendations. NGOs and CSOs play an essential role in implementing the provisions of the convention, which the CMW recognises. For example, the CMW recommended that the Philippine government liaise with local partner networks to provide services and support to migrants and to advocate for migrants’ rights. NGOs and CSOs can confirm or disprove the effectiveness of the state’s implementation of the convention, thanks to their local knowledge and expertise. This knowledge sharing can identify gaps in the current implementation of the convention and bring improvements.

So far, the two consultations have brought a wealth of issues to the forefront. NGOs have identified diverse issues, including concerns regarding the return and reintegration of migrant workers, their access to justice, irregular migration and trafficking, the right to be informed prior to migrating, state authority and recruitment policy, migrant children in the Philippines and the children of Filipino migrants, policy and governance institutions, the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao and women migrants.

The issues raised and the recommendations offered in these consultations will be integrated into a parallel report that replies to the LOIPR. This parallel report will be integral for providing an alternative view beyond the official, government mandated report. It will also be a resource for other NGOs to aid in the identification and addressing of problem areas. Migrant workers and their families continue to face unnecessary trials and tribulations, but continuous, vigilant monitoring of the implementation of the convention will lead to further improvements and progress for migrants’ rights.he return and reintegration of migrant workers, their access to justice, irregular migration and trafficking, the right to be informed prior to migrating, state authority and recruitment policy, migrant children in the Philippines and the children of Filipino migrants, policy and governance institutions, the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao and women migrants.

Country Migration Report: The Philippines 2013

IOM launches Philippines’ first country migration report

Posted on Tue, Feb-26-2013 

Source - http://iom.int/files/live/sites/iom/files/Country/docs/IOM-launches-Philippines-first-country-migration-report.html

Philippines - Filipino migrant workers or overseas Filipino workers (OFW) represent a major socioeconomic sector of the Philippines, contributing about USD 21.3 billion of remittances in 2012. In fact, the recent improvements in the country's GDP were largely due the consistent financial flow from these migrants.

On the heels of this economic growth, the International Organization for Migration today (27 June 2013) launches the Philippines’ first Country Migration Report (CMR), profiling the migration flows of the island nation.

With the Philippines being a prominent origin of migrant labour and permanent migrants to more than 200 destinations worldwide, the 291-page book was drafted in cooperation with 30 contributing organizations, including the Department of Labor & Employment, the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration and the Commission on Filipinos Overseas.

The Philippines CMR is the newest addition to more than 40 country migration profiles that IOM has documented since 2007.

The CMR, largely authored by the Scalabrini Migration Center, highlights the country’s most comprehensive and integrated account of its migration management profile. The report discusses the Philippines’ migration history, the trends and characteristics of its migration flows, the impact of international migration on various fronts and its migration governance.

IOM programme officer Ricardo Casco says the CMR is a good reference for an informed policy as well as responsive service programming and delivery. He says the report was completed through a series of inclusive consultations and data-mapping exercises.

Under the Migrant Workers and Filipinos Act, a provision states that there is a need for a shared government information system on migration.

“One good thing about the process was to have rekindled the network of institutions who needed to sit together just on the goal of migration data sharing and report integration”, says Casco.

The report also brought to light critical analyses of migration issues as well as recommendations on how to address these challenges.

"The recommendations point to the need to view migration issues in a larger perspective. The Philippines must take action, through the domestic economy, to positively redirect migration flows – one that will benefit local and regional development," Casco explains.

The Philippines CMR also underscores the need for engagement of government institutions that are not traditionally sensitized with any role in migration.

The launch was spearheaded by Marco Boasso, Chief of Mission of IOM Philippines, with the keynote address of DOLE Secretary Rosalinda Baldoz and a message from CFO Secretary Imelda Nicolas who shared the lead in mobilizing the inter-agency technical working group.

For more information, please contact

Ricardo Casco
IOM Philippines
Email: rcasco@iom.int

 




by IOM and SMC

Produced within the framework of the Migration Profile Development Project for the Philippines, the Country Migration Report: The Philippines provides a comprehensive evidence-based account of the country's migration experience in a single, concise document as a tool for policy-making. 

The CMR was initiated by the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in response to the Philippine Government's interest to take stock of the country's international migration experience and to harmonize migration data management system within a shared framework. This immediately emerged after the 2011 Global Forum on Migration and Development (GFMD) conference on Migration Profiles co-chaired by the Philippines with Switzerland in Manila. 

The CMR was prepared in cooperation with Scalabrini Migration Center (SMC) with support from the IOM Development Fund and implemented with its key partners: the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE), the Commission on Filipinos Overseas (CFO), and the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (POEA). 

In addition to summarizing readily available migration data sets and statistics, the CMR aims to: identify and analyze the challenges and critical areas surrounding migration data management; help narrow existing gaps by bringing to light stakeholders observations of the Philippines' current migration experience; emphasize the connection between migration and development and its significance in the country's migration governance framework.

The Main Parts

Part A – Becoming a country of migration. With a fast increasing and young population, the Philippines has the demographic characteristics of an emigration country. High level of poverty, lack of adequate infrastructure, and an economic development which does not generate an adequate number of jobs contribute to create the economic context for the propensity to seek employment abroad. The demand for workers from fast developing economies in the Middle East and East Asian countries generate a labor migration program, which has continued and expanded because of lack of opportunities in the domestic labor market and a culture of migration which places employment abroad on top of the aspirations of young Filipinos.

 Part B – Migration trends and characteristics. Since its inception in 1974, the deployment of Filipino  workers has constantly  increased, reaching in 2012 the number of 1,435,166 for landbased workers and 366,865 for seabased workers. It must be  observed that landbased workers include also Filipinos who were already employed abroad and who were rehired after some  vacation at home. In fact, the increase in the number of rehires, which was more significant than that of new hires in recent  years, indicates that the time spent overseas is getting longer and permanent return to the Philippines is postponed. Migrants  originate mostly from Metro Manila and the surrounding provinces. Notable exceptions in this mapping are the provinces of  Pangasinan, Cebu and Maguindanao. In the annual outflow the majority are women, who also tend to be younger than men. The  Gulf countries are the main destination of Filipino workers (67%), while one third go to Asian countries, in particular Hong Kong,  Singapore and Taiwan. Saudi Arabia is always the leading destination country. The top occupations for Filipino workers are  service and production. About 80 percent of OFWs are comprised in those two categories. The single most numerous  occupation is domestic work. The Commission on Filipinos Overseas estimates that the number of Filipinos abroad reaches  approximately 10.5 million, of whom 4.3 million are workers. Perhaps the number of Filipinos permanently abroad (4.7 million) is  overestimated, or requires a more precise definition of who is a Filipino abroad. After 40 years, some constants can be  established. Migration has experienced constant growth, the time spent abroad is also increasing, the top ten countries of destination have remained almost the same, women normally outnumber men in the annual outflows, occupations distribution is dominated by service and production workers, and domestic work is the top occupation of OFWs.

Part C – Impact of migration. Migration affects many people and many aspects political and social realities. Not always sufficient research has been carried out to reach incontrovertible results but some conclusions are generally accepted. Most migrants benefit from migration, but their experience is not without costs. In general, migrants’ families have better housing, better nutrition, better health and better education. Many families, however, also break up because of distance and solitude. At the economic level, migrant families can afford to spend more and come out of poverty level. Some families become dependent on remittances and experience a decrease in labor force participation, but this cannot be generalized. Remittances also increase inequality but it is possible to hypothesize that remittances trickle down to less affluent provinces and communities. To profit from remittances, economic conditions in the country must improve further and generate opportunities for private enterprise and investments. In the labor market, overseas employment reduces to some extent the level of unemployment. At the same time, a close correlation between increase of overseas employment and decrease of unemployment cannot be established. The migration of highly skilled workers did not generate scarcity of skills in the country. There is evidence of brain waste in the migration phenomenon, but data are not sufficient to establish a direct brain drain effect.

There is mismatch between education and labor market in the Philippines. There is an oversupply of graduates in disciplines that are not sufficiently absorbed by the domestic labor market. At the same time, migration exercise a distortive functions in the education system, as too many students enrol in nursing and maritime schools without finding deployment abroad.

Part D – Governance of migration. The Philippines has adopted comprehensive legislation, covering all aspects of the migration phenomenon. It has also entered into bilateral agreements with various governments; it has been active in the migration concerns at the regional level; and pushed for adoption of instruments at the international level. More attention must be given to the local level, where the decision to migrate is forged and where migrants return at the end of the process.

Part E – Main findings, challenges and recommendations. The most important policy decisions to benefit overseas labor are not directed to the migrants themselves but to the country in general, in particular by improving the conditions for national development. Overregulation of overseas labor, forcing migrants of all categories to follow the same procedures, should be avoided. There should be better coordination among government agencies and better training of migration officers. Systematic and periodic consultation among all stakeholders, in the line of the recently started Overseas Landbased Tripartite Consultative Council, should be ensured. Migrants are a resource, not a problem. Efforts should be made to provide them and their organizations adequate capacities. To give migration a better chance to contribute to development, its potential at the local level should be maximized. The connections with the Filipino diaspora should be strengthened, facilitating the formation of business communities among permanent migrants. The diaspora should be informed about development projects in the Philippines and development opportunities should be inserted in the bilateral agreements. Finally, for the management and study of migration improvements should be fostered concerning migration data, beginning with homogenization of definitions, classifications and procedures, to continue with better equipment and training, and common policies and procedures for sharing data among government agencies. It is also desirable to undertake a national survey on migration.

Country Migration Report : The Philippines 2013

Presentation made by Fr. Graziano Battistella
Executive Director, Scalabrini Migration Center